Quick one today as I'm spending all day tomorrow doing stuff for my upcoming wedding (in May 2010) and have three internship interviews and a big grad school homework thingy to do by Tuesday.
Side One:
Piece: Quartet No. 23 in F Major, K 590
1. Allegro moderato
2. Andante; Allegretto
3. Menuetto: Allegretto; Trio
4. Allegro
Composer: Mozart
Performers: The Budepest Quartet: Roisman & A. Schneider, Violins; Ipolyi, Viola; M. Schneider, Cello.
Record Date: 04/29/1935
Side Two:
Piece: Quartet No. 2 in G Major, Op. 18
1. Allegro
2. Adagio cantabile
3. Scherzo: Allegro
4. Allegro molto, quasi presto
Composer: Beethoven
Performers: The Budepest Quartet: Roisman & A Schneider, Violins; Kroyt Viola; M Schneider, Cello.
Record Date: 06/01/1938
The one thing I will point out about these recordings is the recording date. When I thought about it, I began to raise questions about the recording of a temporal art, like music, and how this captures the the intentions of the composer as interpreted by the musician. When these guys recorded the pieces, they did it through one mic, that fed to a piece of equipment, that literally cut the record right then and there. It was one take, no multi-track, no EQ, no compression, no nothing. The reason that I bring this up is because I've been reading a lot of audiophile websites lately, which often state that the goal of a stereo is to replicate the music exactly as it was played. If that is true, and since Mozart was born and died long before recording music was even an idea, couldn't we say that these, what we would call Lo-Fi recordings, are more true to the piece that Mozart put to paper than any recording that is done today using multi-track, post-editing, compression filled, mixed-down tech masturbation? I honestly don't know, but I would say it's a good question to ask as everyone raves about the joys of the new Beatles mixes.
